Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ulysses.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ulysses!smb
From: smb@ulysses.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.columbia
Subject: SRB nozzle problem
Message-ID: <689@ulysses.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 8-Nov-83 17:15:45 EST
Article-I.D.: ulysses.689
Posted: Tue Nov  8 17:15:45 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 9-Nov-83 22:21:42 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 6

Does anyone know what the final verdict was on what caused the lining
erosion?  I just saw a news story that said that although the nozzle
on Columbia was changed, the protective material was OK, and that the
boosters have been "exonerated".  The NASA spokesperson is quotes as
saying that he didn't understand the complex tests performed, but that
NASA is statisfied that there won't be any more problems.