Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wivax.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!wivax!dyer From: dyer@wivax.UUCP (Stephen Dyer) Newsgroups: net.jokes.d Subject: Re: Re: Offensiveness (long article) - (nf) Message-ID: <18932@wivax.UUCP> Date: Sat, 5-Nov-83 15:58:07 EST Article-I.D.: wivax.18932 Posted: Sat Nov 5 15:58:07 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 8-Nov-83 01:14:46 EST References: <95@tekcad.UUCP> Organization: Wang Institute, Tyngsboro, Ma. 01879 Lines: 29 Well, I feel obliged to take a counter-offensive. If you closely read my response to you, I was not advocating censorship, but rather underscoring the equal rights of other members of the net to take issue with articles which are aimed towards belittling individuals or groups, with no redeeming features. I still feel that you are misreading Bradbury, but we'll just have to leave that issue. At the same time, I believe that Phil Ngai's comments accurately describe the nature of USENET--namely a "broadcast" medium, where individual contributors have to take responsibility for their actions, not only as far as their own site is concerned, but also for the net as a whole. If you feel that USENET is equivalent to your local downtown soapbox, where you may say anything you like, without care, then you're mistaken. Read Mark Horton's intro to the net. Read the comments that say that a site may be removed from the net if it persists in behavior damaging to the net. Your "freedom" to say whatever you like will disappear pretty quickly if you exercise it as "freely" as you seem to imply. The issue of censorship is a knotty one, and it hasn't had to be confronted here yet, as far as I know. I am hard pressed to define "behavior damaging to the net" though I know it when I see it. It will be a difficult time when the issue finally comes around. I also wonder about people (not necessarily yourself) who confuse the "exercise of a right" with "appropriate behavior". These are NOT the same. Someone MAY have a "right" to send ugly, degrading commentary floating through the phone lines, but that still doesn't make him any less a boor. /Steve Dyer decvax!bbncca!sdyer