Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site eosp1.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ulysses!princeton!eosp1!robison From: robison@eosp1.UUCP Newsgroups: net.jokes.d Subject: Re: Racist jokes - hate propaganda legislation in Canada Message-ID: <288@eosp1.UUCP> Date: Sun, 13-Nov-83 01:16:02 EST Article-I.D.: eosp1.288 Posted: Sun Nov 13 01:16:02 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 13-Nov-83 23:53:35 EST References: <2646@utcsrgv.UUCP> Organization: Exxon Office Systems, Princeton, NJ Lines: 36 I am sure that the interpretation given of the Canadian law is incorrect. (By the way, pls note: I am not a lawyer, and what follows is NOT legal advice.) First: It is not "Canadians" who must observe this law; it is people under the jurisdisction of canadian law, which certainly includes non- Canadians living in Canada. Second: The apologies and comments that certain groups should not be offended, taken in context with other net mail, may conceivably constitute a defense that the offensive material is being presented to point out, and alleviate, the hatred, as specified within the law. (Don't count on this defense to work though!!) Third: If a legal action is taken on a piece of net mail, the questions of jurisdiction and culpability would be very interesting. WHERE did the crime take place, if the netmail originated in the US and then entered Canada? Who committed the crime? Is it the person who enabled UNIX communications to bring the item into canada over the net? The system engineer on the entrypoint system who should have censored the net news? The author? The point of this note is that if anyone is going to worry about this sort of legal action, it is exactly the wrong people -- it is the administrators who decide to shut down netgroups to avoid responsibility of offending people, not the authors of the material. Why did we bring this subject up in the first place, anyway??? - Keremath, care of: Robison decvax!ittvax!eosp1 or: allegra!eosp1