Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: notes version 1.1.10 usg 11/8/83; site ihlpf.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!ihlpf!rf
From: rf@ihlpf.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: "Re: Why not a varargs declaration? - (nf)"
Message-ID: <212@ihlpf.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Nov-83 08:27:25 EST
Article-I.D.: ihlpf.212
Posted: Mon Nov 14 08:27:25 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Nov-83 05:52:10 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL
Lines: 10

#R:wu1:-18500:ihlpf:18400005:000:377
ihlpf!dap1    Nov 13 10:38:00 1983

Do you people not have a varargs.h header file?  That is what is used in
printf and should be compatible on any other machines so such a mechanism
is provided.  I don't understand why people keep "suggesting" such a
thing.  Maybe varargs.h isn't on all versions.

                                              Darrell Plank
                                              BTL-IH