Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 10/6/83; site ihuxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!houxm!ihnp4!ihuxm!brp
From: brp@ihuxm.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.apple
Subject: Re: In Defense of Apple Pascal
Message-ID: <683@ihuxm.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 4-Nov-83 09:45:49 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxm.683
Posted: Fri Nov  4 09:45:49 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 7-Nov-83 01:20:59 EST
References: <678@ihuxl.UUCP>, <110@pucc-k>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, Il
Lines: 9

No-the New() procedure does not work properly in Apple Pascal.
Memory must be allocated using New() and released in a particular
order or disastrous results are likely to be achieved.  The 
implementation of new should be user-transparent and it is not.
Apple Pascal does not keep an available list of free memory for
new-just as the they do not dynamically allocate strings-another
weakness.  I still like the implementation, however.

		Ben Priest