Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 11/4/83; site ihuxm.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!ihuxm!cwa
From: cwa@ihuxm.UUCP (Carl W. Amport)
Newsgroups: net.politics
Subject: Re: Re: US Casualties
Message-ID: <701@ihuxm.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Nov-83 18:08:00 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxm.701
Posted: Fri Nov 11 18:08:00 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Nov-83 08:27:40 EST
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, Il
Lines: 16


 
In response to "Re: US Casualties" posted by uokvax!rigney:   I agree.

I believe that the worst foreign policy president since World War II,
Jimmy Carter,  was much more dangerous to the security of the
world (and U.S. interests in particular) than is Ronnie Reagan.
The Soviets can now say, "he says what he means," "he enforces his
warnings," and "he doesn't waver back and forth".  'Change his mind
Jimmy' didn't allow them that luxury.  Right or wrong, at least if
the opposition knows what to expect, the possibility of accidental
conflicts should be minimal.  I think tough hard-liners, whether
in this country or another, feel more comfortable dealing with their
own kind rather than with an unknown quantity.  This type of mutual
respect tends to make relations more stable - even between adversaries.

Carl W. Amport 		Naperville, IL.