Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!peterr
From: peterr@utcsrgv.UUCP (Peter Rowley)
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.tv.da
Subject: Nuclear Boondoggle
Message-ID: <2817@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 26-Nov-83 12:15:20 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2817
Posted: Sat Nov 26 12:15:20 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Nov-83 12:34:17 EST
Organization: CSRG, University of Toronto
Lines: 25

Doesn't a 40x (or whatever) overkill stockpile of nuclear weapons sound like
another of those DoD boondoggles (like the $400 hammer) one hears about from
time to time?  Of course, this is a boondoggle which (a) costs a lot more,
(b) threatens the world a lot more, and (c) can be more easily disguised
with terms like "window of vulnerability".

I put it to the net that the MAIN reasons for the current massive levels
of nuclear weapons is (a) the profit motive on the US side and (b) the
empire-building instincts of the military on both sides.  The civilian
governments on both sides have been duped by their military-industrial
complexes through use of strident nationalism and appeals to paranoia,
which is self-perpetuating (e.g. the m-i complex believes it itself).

(a) could be removed by making the production of nuclear weapons solely a
low-profit enterprise.  I don't know how to remove (b)-- nuclear weapons
are inherently powerful and a bureaucracy charged with maintaining them
will necessarily be given a good deal of power-- which gives it a good
deal of power to perpetuate itself (the main raison-d'etre of a bureau-
cracy).

Flames on this welcome, to me or to the net.

peter rowley,  University of Toronto Department of C.S., Ontario Canada M5S 1A4
{cornell,watmath,ihnp4,floyd,allegra,ubc-vision,uw-beaver}!utcsrgv!peterr
{cwruecmp,duke,linus,decvax,research}!utzoo!utcsrgv!peterr