Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ssc-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!david
From: david@ssc-vax.UUCP (David Norris)
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.motss
Subject: Re: Observations on net.motss - homosexuality is a sin
Message-ID: <612@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 10-Nov-83 19:02:39 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.612
Posted: Thu Nov 10 19:02:39 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 12-Nov-83 08:42:59 EST
References: <598@ssc-vax.UUCP>, <173@apollo.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Aerospace, Seattle
Lines: 13


   I don't see where any religous argument is used in this statement at all.
The fact that evolution requires a man and a woman to procreate is a fact; why
are you adding a religous argument to it?  This argument does not state that
it is a sin at all; it merely makes a statement on "the natural order of things"
I stated personal observation on my belief that homosexuality is unnatural
due to the way nature works; even though I am a Christian this shouldn't allow
others to make this kind of a logical error.  I am willing to debate just about
anything in a logical argument;  however, once others begin to add new meaning
to the words to suit their own argument logical reasoning falls apart.
   Comments, anyone?
   -- Dave Norris