Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxi!pyuxss!sebb
From: sebb@pyuxss.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion,net.motss
Subject: Re: Observations on net.motss - homosexuality is a sin
Message-ID: <205@pyuxss.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Nov-83 11:06:13 EST
Article-I.D.: pyuxss.205
Posted: Fri Nov 11 11:06:13 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 13-Nov-83 04:55:15 EST
References: <598@ssc-vax.UUCP>, <173@apollo.UUCP>, <612@ssc-vax.UUCP> The argument that homosexuality is wrong because it canno
Lines: 23

Relay-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mhuxl.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxss.UUCP
Message-ID: <205@pyuxss.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 11-Nov-83 11:06:13 EST

t
Organization: Bell Labs, Piscataway
Lines: 14

produce progeny is not as logical as you suppose. There are numerous
counter-examples. If a women and/or a man are sterile, does this imply
that sex between them is wrong? They certainly cannot produce
children. We can not turn to the other animals for our sense of
naturalness either. Homosexuality has been documented in other
animals therefore animals with no sense of right or wrong are
doing unnatural things. 
	I personally think discussing the unnaturalness of homo-
sexuality is absurd. There are numerous things that man does that
are unnatural in that no other animal does them. Man destroys his
environment so that it is even unfit for him to live in.
	I have more examples of the illogic of the "unnatural"
argument but I don't wish to clog up the net any more. 
					S.Badian