Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ssc-vax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!ssc-vax!david
From: david@ssc-vax.UUCP (David Norris)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Observations on net.motss - homosexuality is a sin
Message-ID: <620@ssc-vax.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Nov-83 13:26:35 EST
Article-I.D.: ssc-vax.620
Posted: Mon Nov 14 13:26:35 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Nov-83 19:57:03 EST
References: ssc-vax.612, <6209@unc.UUCP>
Organization: Boeing Aerospace, Seattle
Lines: 35

Ok, Tim.  For all others reading these arguments, if they are bothering you
(or if you feel we are unduly cluttering up the net), let us know and Tim and
I can continue our discussions via mail.

Surely you can see the error in your debate of my original argument; you are
trying to extrapolate the procreation argument into all other facets of
life.  "It is unnatural to eat rocks" cannot be used to support an argument
such as "We can't watch TV because it is unnatural."  The two topics are
unrelated. 

Secondly, how did this start in the first place?  I think I stated the unnatural
aspect of homosexuality as an opinion;  I didn't think I would draw this much
flak.  However, the discussions have made me do some serious thinking about
my opinions (which have not changed), which I am thankful for.

Thridly, you proceed on the assumption that I am prejudiced toward homosexuals.
This may or may not be true (and would be difficult to prove/disprove anyway),
but what has that got to do with starting a logical argument?
   -- Dave Norris