Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site wivax.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!wivax!dyer
From: dyer@wivax.UUCP (Stephen Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: Re: Berkeley Flame
Message-ID: <18959@wivax.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 13-Nov-83 18:39:36 EST
Article-I.D.: wivax.18959
Posted: Sun Nov 13 18:39:36 1983
Date-Received: Mon, 14-Nov-83 08:21:20 EST
References: <591@ihuxx.UUCP> <18957@wivax.UUCP>, <518@ariel.UUCP>
Organization: Wang Institute, Tyngsboro, Ma.  01879
Lines: 13

Semantic mistake??  Bah!  I'll bet that EVERY knowledgable reader knew exactly
what I meant.  My use of the phrase "virtual memory" in this context was
clear.

Your argument is a feeble attempt to obscure the fact the BTL UNIX on the VAX
can support a process no larger than the maximum amount of physical memory,
less the space occupied by the kernel.  I hope this is clearer.

Sorry to flame--I feel that a response which nitpicks without addressing
the primary issue raised by the news item isn't much of a response.

/Steve Dyer
decvax!bbncca!sdyer