Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hp-pcd.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!hp-pcd!jim
From: jim@hp-pcd.UUCP (Jim Andreas)
Newsgroups: net.unix-wizards
Subject: 750 vs. 780 Performance? - (nf)
Message-ID: <2535@hp-pcd.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 23-Nov-83 03:33:31 EST
Article-I.D.: hp-pcd.2535
Posted: Wed Nov 23 03:33:31 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 26-Nov-83 04:37:10 EST
Sender: netnews@hp-pcd.UUCP
Organization: Hewlett-Packard, Corvallis OR
Lines: 23

#N:hp-pcd:19500008:000:474
hp-pcd!jim    Nov 21 17:30:00 1983



	What is the relative performance of a
	VAX-11/750 relative to a VAX-11/780?
	I have run a seive of eratosthenes
	benchmark, and find that the 750 is
	quite slow - only 25% of the performance
	of a 780.  We do not have a 780, and so
	I am using the figure for the 780 given in
	Byte magazine, January 1983, page 298.  

	Does anyone in the usenet community have
	performance figures on the 780 vs 750
	(and the other clones, for that matter)?


	Jim Andreas
	hp-pcd\!jim