Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1exp 11/4/83; site ihuxi.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!ihuxi!walsh
From: walsh@ihuxi.UUCP (B. Walsh)
Newsgroups: net.roots,net.women,net.flame,net.misc,net.religion
Subject: Re: A Common Female Ancestor for Everyone
Message-ID: <675@ihuxi.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 15-Nov-83 08:42:35 EST
Article-I.D.: ihuxi.675
Posted: Tue Nov 15 08:42:35 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 16-Nov-83 01:36:35 EST
References: <115@astrovax.UUCP>, <5493@mcvax.UUCP> <3791@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, Il
Lines: 11

Rene- (Re: your response)          

When I first read the question about the skull, etc., I thought the same
thing you did, but then I thought that this woman of 50-200,000 years ago
obviously also had a mother, and HER mother had a mother, etc. I think
that's where the confusion is. Apparently, they've only traced back so
far, but not far enough. I'm confused! Unless this particular woman's traits
are the only ones that have made it down this far, and her ancestors'
traits were obliterated. Beats me!

B. Walsh