Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site philabs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!akgua!psuvax!burdvax!presby!seismo!philabs!jah From: jah@philabs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Human rights (...or Conservative vs. Liberal) Message-ID: <27370@philabs.UUCP> Date: Wed, 23-Nov-83 09:03:48 EST Article-I.D.: philabs.27370 Posted: Wed Nov 23 09:03:48 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 26-Nov-83 05:57:53 EST References: <524@ihuxp.UUCP> Organization: Philips Labs, Briarcliff Manor, NY Lines: 23 path: (sdcvax,mcvax,cbosgd,allegra,decvax)!philabs!jah <> Enough is Enough already!!! The difference between liberals and conservatives is not only foreign policy. As a matter of fact, it is generally domestic policy that determines this. What you call liberal is isolationist and what you call conservative is trigger happy!!! Neither of which are going to make it in the "real world". Nowadays the distinction between liberals and conservatives is NOT so CRYSTAL CLEAR as MOST OF YOU ON THE NET SEEM TO THINK!! If you're going to argue policy, that's one thing....But can ya PLEASE stop making the issue liberal vs conservative. Kennedy was a liberal and believed in defense and the right of human beings to have free choice (whether or not Americans). Roosevelt was a liberal and he too believed in defending the rights of other democratic countries. It's not enough to use liberal and conservative as defense for your opinions in your rebuttal. <> That felt good!!