Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houxh.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!houxm!houxh!pvl
From: pvl@houxh.UUCP (P.LAMASTER)
Newsgroups: net.invest
Subject: Re: money market account and signature g - (nf)
Message-ID: <303@houxh.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 28-Nov-83 16:02:28 EST
Article-I.D.: houxh.303
Posted: Mon Nov 28 16:02:28 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 30-Nov-83 02:07:27 EST
References: <4180@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 14


  When I bought stock, I listed it in both my name and my wife's
name so that *either* of us could sell it, if need be.  When it
came time to sell it, I was told that we had to have *both* signatures
and that there was *no* wording of multi-named stock (aside from
a trust arrangement) that was an either/or arrangement (as opposed
to *and).  The connection to the money market account referred to
in the other article is that, since I was dealing with company stock,
I could get *my* signature guaranteed at work, but we had to go to
our local bank to get my wife's signature guaranteed.  We eventually
got the stock sold, but it was a hassle.
  Anybody else surprised that stock *can't* be an either/or listing?
    Pete LaMaster BTL NJ (201)949-0040  ihnp4!houxh!pvl