Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pur-ee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!notes
From: notes@pur-ee.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.lang.c
Subject: Re: Re: Why not a varargs declaration? - (nf)
Message-ID: <1116@pur-ee.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Nov-83 18:35:26 EST
Article-I.D.: pur-ee.1116
Posted: Mon Nov 14 18:35:26 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Nov-83 20:13:56 EST
Sender: notes@pur-ee.UUCP
Organization: Electrical Engineering Department , Purdue University
Lines: 14

#R:hou3c:-10800:ecn-ee:13100008:000:309
ecn-ee!davy    Nov 14 07:32:00 1983


Berkeley HAS picked up the macros for variable arguments.  See varargs(3).
They've been around ever since 4.0 BSD, at least.  Strange, though, out of
all the variable argument routines I've seen in the Berkeley code, and
other stuff, I've never once seen anyone USE these macros!

--Dave Curry
pur-ee!davy