Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pucc-k
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!CSvax:Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:ags
From: CSvax:Pucc-H:Pucc-I:Pucc-K:ags@pur-ee.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.micro,net.micro.apple
Subject: Re: In Defense of Apple Pascal
Message-ID: <110@pucc-k>
Date: Sun, 30-Oct-83 13:18:31 EST
Article-I.D.: pucc-k.110
Posted: Sun Oct 30 13:18:31 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 6-Nov-83 15:00:43 EST
References: <678@ihuxl.UUCP>
Organization: Purdue University Computing Center
Lines: 12

Dave Newkirk writes of Apple Pascal:

  "It is a good implementation of the language, lacking only the NEW() function
for memory allocation."

  I agree that it is a good implementation of the language, but NEW() works
just fine on my Apple Pascal 1.1 system.  I suspect he meant that DISPOSE()
is not implemented, which is true.  There are MARK() and RELEASE() procedures
offered as a partial substitute.

				Dave Seaman
				..!pur-ee!pucc-k:ags