Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site pyuxa.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!mhuxm!pyuxi!pyuxa!wetcw From: wetcw@pyuxa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics,btl.general Subject: Re: BTL Takes the Lead Message-ID: <348@pyuxa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 15-Nov-83 12:01:28 EST Article-I.D.: pyuxa.348 Posted: Tue Nov 15 12:01:28 1983 Date-Received: Thu, 17-Nov-83 00:32:23 EST References: <703@ihuxm.UUCP> Organization: Bell Labs, Piscataway Lines: 34 I am at a loss to understand how anyone can advocate a one-sided nuclear freeze given events over the past 50 odd years. Soviet leaders, from Stalin to Andropov, have been following the Marxist line without deviation throughout this span of history. From the subjugation and massacure of the Ukrainian people to the supplying of SAM missles to the Syrian military, they have not wavered from Marx's dream of world domination. Nothing has happened within the last 20 years that seems to have changed this goal. Have you forgotten the Korean airliner, Afganistan, new SAM missles in Lebenon, Soviet arms caches in Grenada, poison rain in Cambodia, the assasination attempt on the Pope, the assasination of four Korean ministers, the jailing of dissidents, the sujegation of soviet jews, the closing of all of their borders over the past 40 years, the stalling and disruption of every arms talk conference, the stationing of soviet subs off the east and west coasts, the use of Cuba as a surrogate revolutionary tool, the twisting of the truth about world events, and on and on in every facet of human life. Wouldn't it be nice if the same Times ad could be run in Isvetia (fat chance). The naive of the world are going to have to wake up and smell the coffee. The Soviet Union is not going to come to the barganing table as long as they in a position of power over the West. Nuclear disarmament is not going to become the act of the day because we wish it to happen. The Soviet leaders only seem to understand and recognize power. We have to somehow convince them that we are not going to negotiate from a position of weakness. Therefore, as sad as it is, we must maintain a position of strength or throw in the towel which would mean there would be no more dialogues such as this.