Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!ihnp4!houxm!hogpc!houxn!4341mrz
From: 4341mrz@houxn.UUCP (M.ZBORAY)
Newsgroups: net.politics,btl.followup
Subject: Re: Re: BTL Takes the Lead
Message-ID: <432@houxn.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 16-Nov-83 13:16:59 EST
Article-I.D.: houxn.432
Posted: Wed Nov 16 13:16:59 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 17-Nov-83 06:41:08 EST
References: <745@ihuxl.UUCP> ihldt.2107
Lines: 20

I'm afraid I must agree with John Haller.
I think we all would agree that weapons of war sould g`be eliminated.
On the other hand, restraining only one of two parties which do not trust
each other only invites beating for the one who is restained.
I would speculate that the reason the we build more advanced weapons first
is that technologically we are slightly adavanced comaredt to the USSR.
I don't think it is because we intend upon escalating an arms race.
Finally, when they submit a petition advocating motherhood and apple pie,
I want to sign it too!
That is to say there is a simple solution to a complex problem between 
two nations is naive.
I'm afraid that the USSR's track record on human rights and other issues 
is disturbing enough that I'd rather not lowwer my defenses until 
I see a new track record.
Of couse, one may point a finger back at US and say we have faults also
but I am much more confident that our dirty laundry will get aired before
anyone elses will.
Thankyou for listening.
Yours Truly
Michael R. Zboray