Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site hou3c.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!burl!hou3c!ka
From: ka@hou3c.UUCP (Kenneth Almquist)
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: A Common Female Ancestor for Everyone
Message-ID: <112@hou3c.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 14-Nov-83 22:58:05 EST
Article-I.D.: hou3c.112
Posted: Mon Nov 14 22:58:05 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 15-Nov-83 20:56:34 EST
References: astrovax.115 <192@wxlvax.UUCP>, <662@ihuxi.UUCP> <1304@burdvax.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel, NJ
Lines: 13


	The Bible teaches that Adam and Eve had other sons and daughters
	besides Cain and Abel.  Seth was one of the other childern.

The Bible does *not* make reference to any daughters of Adam and Eve.
It is true that the Bible states that Adam and Eve had three sons rather
than two, but this hardly detracts from the point of the original article.

I don't understand why Tom is so eager to have the wives of Cain and
Seth be born of Adam and Eve anyway since that would make the marriages
incestuous.
					Kenneth Almquist