Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!ittvax!bunker!bunkerb!garys From: garys@bunkerb.UUCP (Gary Samuelson) Newsgroups: net.religion Subject: Response to rlr's summary Message-ID: <260@bunkerb.UUCP> Date: Fri, 18-Nov-83 17:47:34 EST Article-I.D.: bunkerb.260 Posted: Fri Nov 18 17:47:34 1983 Date-Received: Sun, 20-Nov-83 19:25:27 EST Lines: 50 My comments regarding Rich Rosen's summary: 1. I have no proof that there is or isn't a god. Then why assume that there isn't? Why call those who think there is childish (and other unpleasant things)? 2. There seem to be rampant assumptions ... ...on the part of both believers and unbelievers. 3. The power of belief in god has been demonstrated. But the power seems to stem from the act of believing, and the feeling one gets from this act. 4. The notion of human beings free to make their own choices is very dangerous to the existing power structure, not just to religion. ... What we need is an accommodation for all individuals and not a single imposed morality that befits a less free age. How do you propose accomodating those individuals who disagree with you? Do you wish to accomodate the thieves, murderers, rapists, etc.? Or are you going to impose some kind of morality on them? 5. I believe in science. If you mean you think science has, or can find, the answers to all of humanity's problems, I disagree. If you mean you think that science is an effective tool at discovering answers to certain questions about the way the universe operates, I agree. If you mean you think that science can discover WHY the universe operates the way it does, I think I disagree. "Do unto others" is a good idea BECAUSE IT WORKS IN THE REAL WORLD!!!! Not because it says it in a book... Other ideas also "work" in the real world: 1. Do unto others before they do unto you "works" (sometimes). 2. He who has the gold makes the rules "works" (a lot). "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you" does not always "work" in the real world. Not long ago there was a discussion in this group concerning that fact. In other words, it is not sufficient that an idea "work". Having enjoyed the discussion, Gary Samuelson