Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site ucf-cs.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!duke!giles@ucf-cs.UUCP (Bruce Giles) From: giles@ucf-cs.UUCP Newsgroups: net.space Subject: Non-equatorial Launch Loops: OOPS! Message-ID: <1063@ucf-cs.UUCP> Date: Fri, 11-Nov-83 12:54:23 EST Article-I.D.: ucf-cs.1063 Posted: Fri Nov 11 12:54:23 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 12-Nov-83 20:32:46 EST References: <13396@sri-arpa.UUCP>, <1059@ucf-cs.UUCP> Organization: University of Central Florida Lines: 51 >>>BLUSH<<< I have just finished carefully reading the original article in the December issue of *Analog*, and to my great embarrassment found that I misunderstood the geometry of the loop. I had thought that the side view of a Launch Loop was: --> (motion) ------------------------------ (space) / \ / \ ---------------------------------------- (ground) (motion) <-- The geometry discussed in the article was actually: <===> (motion) =============================== (space) // \\ // \\ (_) (_) (ground) This clearly eliminates the need for concern over the gyroscopic properties of the loop. Similiarly, there should be no problem with coupling to the earth's magnetic field (at least to a first approximation). However, I still maintain that the Coriolis force, or a related pseudo-force, will still distort the space-borne segments of the loop. --------------------------------------------------------------- Sidenote: Bill Jefferys @ utastronomy -- I tried to respond to you but decvax kicked back my mail. (It didn't recog- nize utastro, error code 101 ???). Alas, that means that my responses will get to you via USENET before I can get ahold of the right person here to clear up the problem. (Veterans day ....) --------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Giles decvax!ucf-cs!giles (UUCP) UCF, Dept of Math, Orlando Fl 32816 (Snail)