Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site houxh.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!houxm!houxh!pvl
From: pvl@houxh.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.tv.da
Subject: Re: TDA
Message-ID: <301@houxh.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 22-Nov-83 15:28:22 EST
Article-I.D.: houxh.301
Posted: Tue Nov 22 15:28:22 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 25-Nov-83 04:16:35 EST
References: <588@ihuxv.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 14


  Although I generally agree that TDA itself was a let-down, I was
surprised to find out how few people watched the panel discussion
which followed.  The film's only usefulness was to stimulate people
to discuss the problem and possibilities for avoiding it.
  I found that contrary to my impressions, Henry Kissinger seemed
to be a realistic pacifist: he seems to want elimination of nuclear
weapons (like all sane people) but realizes the real problems standing
in the way of doing so.  I was surprised that the content of the discussion
*was* so good.  How come most of the people I talked to simply turned
the TV off after the film (which should have simply been a teaser).
Did *you* watch the panel discussion?
  Pete LaMaster NJ (201)949-0040  ihnp4!houxh!pvl