Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site amd70.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!allegra!amd70!phil
From: phil@amd70.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: license for second CPU?
Message-ID: <4072@amd70.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 6-Nov-83 21:41:17 EST
Article-I.D.: amd70.4072
Posted: Sun Nov  6 21:41:17 1983
Date-Received: Tue, 8-Nov-83 09:11:04 EST
Organization: AMD, Santa Clara, CA
Lines: 23

I have a question about something that sounds like it should be illegal
but I can't find anything that says it actually is. This question should
not be taken as an indication that I plan to do it.

The cost to license a second CPU for System V is $16,000. I get quotes
for a binary license anywhere between $3,000 and $6,000. Suppose I get
a binary license for "AMDVAX". Would it be legal for me to make a copy
of the source code from "AMDCAD" (which does have a System V source license)
and place it on "AMDVAX" even though "AMDVAX" has a binary only license?
What if I promise never to compile the source code? :-)

I notice that the license agreement for V7 allows disclosure of the
licensed software to employees of the licensee, I assume System V is
licensed in a similar manner.

There's a section about not making copies which are not necessary to the
uses granted under the license, but I would think studying the source code
is a legitimate use.

DISCLAIMER: I AM NOT ASKING THIS QUESTION ON AMD'S BEHALF, BUT OUT OF
MY OWN CURIOSITY.
-- 
Phil Ngai (408) 988-7777 {ucbvax|decwrl|ihnp4|allegra}!amd70!phil