Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mddc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-vax!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!cbosgd!qusavx!mddc!chris
From: chris@mddc.UUCP (Chris Maloney)
Newsgroups: net.arch,net.micro.68k,net.micro.16k
Subject: 16k vs 68k vs 432
Message-ID: <294@mddc.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Dec-83 21:10:49 EST
Article-I.D.: mddc.294
Posted: Wed Dec 21 21:10:49 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Dec-83 00:40:30 EST
Organization: MDDC, Cincinnati, Ohio
Lines: 14

Though we have all seen parts of this discussion before and
could live without some of the repeations of the same ideas,
I would like to see some discussion of the issues.  I am not
really qualified to comment but would like to relate some ideas
of a friend of mine.  He is a devoted Motorola fan and claims
they buy far have the best support chips (Memory Management,
Communications, ...).  He also feels the Motorola will in the
future and has in the past offer much better support than
NS or Intel.  His says about Intel, he wouldn't like to compete
with Big Blue useing chips from the company they control.
He will admit that the 16k has a better instruction set than
the 68k.

Let's here it (but only once).