Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!wdc
From: wdc@mit-eddie.UUCP (William Cattey)
Newsgroups: net.bugs.2bsd,net.lang.c
Subject: Uses for non-unique names in structures.
Message-ID: <1006@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Dec-83 13:35:10 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1006
Posted: Tue Dec  6 13:35:10 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 9-Dec-83 02:13:15 EST
References: <738@garfield.UUCP> <2895@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 19


	It is a neat feature all right, but I hope you never
decide to port programs to other C implementations with it 
present.  It is beautiful, and useful, and not portable!  
The big problem I see with it is that it is such a neat feature
that code written with it will get *ugly* when it has to be replaced
with a more portable construct.  My personal opinion is to use
a more portable syntax in the first version and not risk uglification.

	I believe that C compilers for version 7 and earlier
complained about non-unique names for elements in a structure
regardless of type.

	If neither portability nor future uglification matter
then use non-unique element names with depraved abandon.

Yow!  Am I Emily Post yet?  :-)
W. Cattey.
wdc%ccc@mit-mc  (arpa)
...decvax!genrad!mit-eddie!wdc  (uucp)