Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site fortune.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!mit-eddie!mit-vax!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!fortune!olson
From: olson@fortune.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.bugs.4bsd
Subject: Re: 4.2BSD installation mystery ... - (nf)
Message-ID: <1920@fortune.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Dec-83 04:03:24 EST
Article-I.D.: fortune.1920
Posted: Thu Dec  8 04:03:24 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 9-Dec-83 06:45:32 EST
Sender: notes@fortune.UUCP
Organization: Fortune Systems, Redwood City, CA
Lines: 10

#R:rna:-18400:fortune:2000004:000:298
fortune!olson    Dec  7 23:10:00 1983

I can't confirm or deny Steve's question as to the problem
 with raw vs. block devices and fsck, but I do know that the
 4.1 (and I suspect the V7) versions of fsck do a sync() system
 call before they start doing any checking

	Dave Olson, Fortune Systems {ihnp4,harpo,ucbvax!amd70}!fortune!olson