Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site tekcad.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!decvax!tektronix!tekcad!franka From: franka@tekcad.UUCP Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Re: Defenseless Animals? - (nf) Message-ID: <164@tekcad.UUCP> Date: Sat, 17-Dec-83 00:38:27 EST Article-I.D.: tekcad.164 Posted: Sat Dec 17 00:38:27 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 13-Dec-83 01:44:27 EST Sender: franka@tekcad.UUCP Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR Lines: 33 #R:pyuxa:-42300:tekcad:2100007:000:1509 tekcad!franka Dec 10 21:38:00 1983 /***** tekcad:net.flame / ncsu!mauney / 7:08 pm Dec 10, 1983*/ (1) Hunting a deer may be less cruel than letting it starve, and less cruel than raising a steer in a pen and slaughtering it, but the raising and killing cattle is done for the necessity of human nutrition and for the esthetics of food. Hunting is done for the sport of killing. Therefore there is a great difference in viewpoint, even if there is no difference in the result. Not that I want to ban hunting. But I object to claims that there is any purpose to it beyond the fun of going out and killing Bambi. Jon Mauney ncsu!mauney /* ---------- */ Have you ever tasted vennison, Mr. Mauney? I have and I like it. And I can tell you that beef does not taste the same. I hunt to obtain the esthetics in food of vennison. As soon as you get a group of deer to breed in captivity to provide vennison steaks for humankind's benefit, I will agree to stop hunting for this reason. The same goes for squirrel and quail. I have stopped hunting rabbits because I can obtain them commercially. One can provide other sources of protein besides commercially bred beef, poultry, etc. But I assume you still eat those poor defenseless animals, so I guess your tastes dictate your morality. And if you allow yourself that luxury, please allow me the same. From the truly menacing, /- -\ but usually underestimated, <-> Frank Adrian (tektronix!tekcad!franka)