Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.politics,net.flame
Subject: Re: Ronald Rayguns Strikes Again - (B-news)
Message-ID: <2310@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 20-Dec-83 12:17:46 EST
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2310
Posted: Tue Dec 20 12:17:46 1983
Date-Received: Thu, 22-Dec-83 04:44:02 EST
References: <1278@pur-ee.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 34


Seems to me that a man who has been shot once, nearly shot at
twice, and been threatened many times may be something other
than paranoid when he defends his person.

It seems to me that people who say otherwise don't give
much of a damn about other people, rather they would
like to grind axes to a blunt point.  

The vulnerability of ANY of the state buildings of the USA
is frightening, if you consider access by air.  Perhaps
the public posting of SAM's isn't the most discrete way of
protecting the White House, Capitol, etc, but it is possibly
the most honest and most effective.  <Its effectiveness depends
on the terrorists belief (or non-belief) of the missile threat.>

I think that the deliberate emotion-mongering criticism of
Reagan is nothing else but an attempt at political slander.
I think that articles of such a nature should appear in net.flame,
where they will be dealt with in a fashion befitting their nature.

And what's WRONG with a
"Drug store truck drivin' man"
<Who's NOT the head of the KKK.>
Joan, you were wrong on that one.


==============================
>From the torch of:

{ulysses,harpo,allegra,research}!rabbit!jj

<And, I'm generally CALLED jj, for those of you who can't
deal with machine names.>