Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site ut-sally.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!cmcl2!floyd!harpo!seismo!ut-sally!riddle From: riddle@ut-sally.UUCP (Prentiss Riddle) Newsgroups: net.flame Subject: Re: Breeding of Humans Message-ID: <677@ut-sally.UUCP> Date: Wed, 21-Dec-83 13:03:59 EST Article-I.D.: ut-sally.677 Posted: Wed Dec 21 13:03:59 1983 Date-Received: Fri, 23-Dec-83 00:38:52 EST References: <331@hocda.UUCP>, <1123@rocksvax.UUCP> <1128@rocksvax.UUCP> <1160@mhuxm.UUCP> Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 31 I'm rather surprised that people are taking this discussion so seriously. How many of you really believe that qualities like intelligence can be bred for? Do you have any trustworthy evidence that this is the case? My suspicion, which I'll admit is not founded on any systematic study of the matter, is that the genetic component of human intelligence is dwarfed by a huge variety of environmental factors: health of the mother, pre- and post- natal nutrition, stimulation at an early age, education, and societal emphasis on intellectual activities, just to name a few. Serious neglect in any of these areas can turn anyone with the genes for genius (if such even exist) into a simpleton; some would even argue that genius is really a fortuitous combi- nation of these environmental factors, and that "native intelligence" is a myth (with the one major exception that some people are born idiots). Our very definition of terms like "intelligence" and "genius" is subjective and cultural; I.Q. tests and the like mostly just test society's notions of what an individual's abilities should be, not the individual's innate capacity. It seems very unlikely to me that there is a gene controlling intelligence, at least not what we usually mean by the word. When the subject of eugenics comes up, the example of Nazi Germany usually gets dragged in. Whatever it was the Nazis were doing with their eugenics programs, they were NOT breeding a race of supermen. While they did do a limited amount of selecting a g a i n s t certain genetic traits -- gross physical disorders and the like -- they were certainly not selecting f o r intelligence or anything like it. They were selecting primarily along the lines of religion, politics, and race, and if there is anything that the geneticists are sure of, it is that such groupings have no bearing whatsoever on intelligence. ---- Prentiss Riddle ("Aprendiz de todo, maestro de nada.") {ihnp4,seismo,ctvax}!ut-sally!riddle