Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!henry From: henry@utzoo.UUCP (Henry Spencer) Newsgroups: net.politics,net.followup Subject: Re: Soviet Reaction to Pershings Message-ID: <3401@utzoo.UUCP> Date: Mon, 5-Dec-83 21:05:00 EST Article-I.D.: utzoo.3401 Posted: Mon Dec 5 21:05:00 1983 Date-Received: Mon, 5-Dec-83 21:05:00 EST References: <399@reed.UUCP>, <5535@mcvax.UUCP> Organization: U of Toronto Zoology Lines: 43 Piet Beertema asks: Besides, why is it that the NATO still doesn't want to declare it will never be the first to use nuclear arms? The answer to this is very simple: because NATO would have a very hard time defending Western Europe without them. NATO's fundamental reliance on nuclear weapons is a result of Europe's unwillingness to commit adequate resources to non-nuclear defences. And you are in a very poor position to complain, Piet, because the Netherlands is one of the worst offenders in this regard. (Just to make it clear that I am not saying this out of any anti-Netherlands bias: Canada is another one.) If you want nuclear weapons out of Europe -- a sensible idea -- you should be campaigning for more money and resources for your army, navy, and air force. When was the last time you made any effort toward this? (If you want a specific example of military underspending and gross unpreparedness: practically none of the European air forces give their pilots the NATO recommended minimum flying time per year. The basic cause is that the fuel costs too much. Nobody counts the cost of pilots who simply don't have adequate practice to do their job in a crisis.) "Now if all of you Americans would look at the situation as indicated in the original article, you would certainly understand why there is such massive opposition in Europe against your missiles... You would understand why the Peace Movement here in Europe is growing and growing. You would understand why in Britain a couple of thousand (UK and US!) military and policemen are needed to keep a few hundred peace movement women out of the Greenham Common base..." Well, I'm not an American, but I understand quite well why all this is happening. Baby wants papa to give him the moon: he doesn't want those nasty nuclear weapons, and he doesn't want to pay for reasonable non-nuclear defences, so he pretends that he doesn't need any of these things anyway, and that the people who claim otherwise are evil warmongers. This sounds remarkably like what everybody (the US too, by the way) was saying in the late 1930s. I'm sure that you can find people in the Netherlands who were alive then and can tell you about it. And about what happened next. -- Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology {allegra,ihnp4,linus,decvax}!utzoo!henry