Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!decwrl!daemon From: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Newsgroups: net.mail Subject: Message-ID, Destination is correct, if done right... Message-ID: <4711@decwrl.UUCP> Date: Tue, 27-Dec-83 22:36:48 EST Article-I.D.: decwrl.4711 Posted: Tue Dec 27 22:36:48 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Dec-83 06:09:38 EST Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP Organization: DEC Western Research Lab, Los Altos, CA Lines: 15 From: John Covert That's right, that will prevent loops, as long as what is being checked is the "current" destination, and not the original one. Improperly implemented (for example, looking at the original destination) this would also prevent someone from forwarding a message to a destination which requires that the message cross a path it has crossed before. And the checking mechanism must also take into account the fact that nodenames in different domains can have the same name (apollo.uucp and apollo.enet are two different destinations). /John ...{ucbvax,decvax,allegra}!decwrl!rhea!castor!covert