Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site mit-eddie.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!mit-eddie!nessus
From: nessus@mit-eddie.UUCP (Doug Alan)
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re: Oh, well.
Message-ID: <1018@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 8-Dec-83 06:58:37 EST
Article-I.D.: mit-eddi.1018
Posted: Thu Dec  8 06:58:37 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 9-Dec-83 06:32:46 EST
References: <1677@tekig.UUCP> <1008@mit-eddie.UUCP>
Organization: MIT, Cambridge, MA
Lines: 27

     From: davidl@tekig.UUCP (David Levadie)
     Genesis SUCKS.  They crawled out of the same garbage can as Supertwank.
     Furthermore, their lead singer sounds like a DUCK... You wankers all
     listen to Blubberboy and Journey and Rush, too, right?

You bletcherous, vile, cretin!  How could you compare Rush to the likes of
Blubberboy and Journey???  That's like putting Lisp in the same class with
Cobol!  Rush is a great, inovative, artistic group (I admit they sold out to
pop recently, but at least it is artistic pop), while Journey and Blubberboy
pour out nothing but stale, bland, commercial drivel!  Genesis is pretty cruddy
too now, though, they weren't way back when Peter Gabriel was in the group.

This quote below should prove that Rush does not belong in the class in which
you have placed it.

     From: gds@mit-eddie.UUCP (Greg Skinner)
     I always enjoyed Loverboy and Journey
     (actually bought two Journey albums which is saying a lot since I don't
     usually buy albums).  I don't know enough about Rush to comment.


Not afraid to admit that if it's not art it should be thrown in the dispos-all,

			Doug Alan
			genrad!mit-eddie!nessus
			Nessus@MIT-MC