Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site decwrl.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!harpo!seismo!hao!hplabs!hpda!fortune!amd70!decwrl!daemon
From: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.music
Subject: Re; removing net.records
Message-ID: <4678@decwrl.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 21-Dec-83 10:57:37 EST
Article-I.D.: decwrl.4678
Posted: Wed Dec 21 10:57:37 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 24-Dec-83 11:24:59 EST
Sender: daemon@decwrl.UUCP
Organization: DEC Western Research Lab, Los Altos, CA
Lines: 26

From: In.from.the.ENET, sent by Ed Featherston <roll::featherston>

 Begin Forwarded Message:
              -------------------------------------------

Newsgroup : net.music
>From : GALAXY::MALIK
Organization : Digital Equipment Corp.
Re; removing net.records

	I agree with Prentiss. I see no reason to have net.music and
net.records existing simultaneously.

	I'm on both lists only because I fear missing something 
interesting. Does anyone object to removing net.records??

						,Karl

	(UUCP)  {decvax, ucbvax, allegra}!decwrl!rhea!galaxy!malik

	(ARPA)  decwrl!rhea!galaxy!malik@Berkeley
	        decwrl!rhea!galaxy!malik@SU-Shasta

              -------------------------------------------
 End Forwarded Message