Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!dave
From: dave@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Sherman)
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.foo and net.foo.expert
Message-ID: <2945@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 16-Dec-83 13:33:42 EST
Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2945
Posted: Fri Dec 16 13:33:42 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 16-Dec-83 13:49:13 EST
References: <2391@alice.UUCP>
Organization: The Law Society of Upper Canada, Toronto
Lines: 9

I agree with Adam on this one. Here's the test: do you read
net.astro.expert and not net.astro, or net.astro and not net.astro.expert?

As long as few or no people actually read one group and not the other,
there's no need for separate groups.

Dave Sherman
-- 
 {allegra,cornell,decvax,ihnp4,linus,utzoo}!utcsrgv!dave