Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!rigney
From: rigney@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.news.group
Subject: Re: net.foo and net.foo.expert - (nf)
Message-ID: <4614@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 18-Dec-83 22:52:07 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.4614
Posted: Sun Dec 18 22:52:07 1983
Date-Received: Wed, 21-Dec-83 01:20:35 EST
Lines: 19

#R:alice:-239100:uokvax:9300004:000:710
uokvax!rigney    Dec 16 15:58:00 1983

I also dislike the idea of creating net.bio without creating
net.bio.expert for people who want to talk serious business
without having to skip through interminable discussions.  On
the other hand, there are those of us who are interested in
biology, but not in gel electrophoresis.  I think these two
groups are quite distinct.  If serious bio workers have to
wade through discussions they're not interested in, they'll
just unsubscribe, which will drastically limit the usefulness
of net.bio to the serious biologists.

Perhaps someone should request that articles be posted to
either net.astro or net.astro.expert, NEVER both.  I imagine
most subscribers read both if either.

	Carl
	..!ctvax!uokvax!rigney