Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hou2g.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!ihnp4!houxm!hou2g!stekas
From: stekas@hou2g.UUCP (J.STEKAS)
Newsgroups: net.physics, net.religion
Subject: Re: net.origins?
Message-ID: <127@hou2g.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Dec-83 16:06:34 EST
Article-I.D.: hou2g.127
Posted: Thu Dec 15 16:06:34 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Dec-83 01:57:51 EST
References: <14575@sri-arpa.UUCP>
Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ
Lines: 13

No to net.origins!!

Let's call it net.creation. After all, the creation "scientists" are not
interested in the origins of life or the universe. Since their object is
only to peddle creationism the newsgroup title should be as narrow as the
subject - net.creation.

Recently appearing in net.ai was the following rule-of-thumb with
regard to determining whether a discipline is scientific:

          "If it has science in the title, it's not."

                                                           Jim