Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!rigney From: rigney@uokvax.UUCP Newsgroups: net.politics Subject: Re: Disinformation, KGB and CIA, the vie - (nf) Message-ID: <4339@uiucdcs.UUCP> Date: Sun, 4-Dec-83 23:00:35 EST Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.4339 Posted: Sun Dec 4 23:00:35 1983 Date-Received: Tue, 6-Dec-83 23:13:53 EST Lines: 36 #R:dciem:-51000:uokvax:5000033:000:1558 uokvax!rigney Dec 3 09:43:00 1983 No, No, No! The fact that the KGB funds certain elements of the peace movement is not a smear against the need for Peace. I'm not saying that the peace movement is wrong, just because the KGB supports it. Offhand I can't think of anything else the KGB is for which I'm for as well, but that doesn't mean I can generalize to say that if the KGB is for hampering U.S. missile emplacement, I'm automatically in favor of the missiles. Now that you mention it, whatever peace movements there are in Eastern Europe do exist by the KGB's discretion, if not direction. If the KGB didn't want a peace movement in Eastern Europe, there wouldn't be one. Likewise, if they did want one, there would be one. This isn't to say that just because there is one, the KGB is behind it. It's possible the KGB just doesn't care (Ha!), or is willing to let it exist, or support something that was already there, for their own ends. For those who would like to claim that the KGB has no control over the Eastern European nations, I can only suggest a bit of reading and research; you might start with Barron's books on the KGB, which are interesting in their own right. In fact, the Eastern European Security Services are very much under the thumb of the KGB. My information in these matters comes from a graduate seminar on intelligence (especially U.S. and Soviet) taken this term, along with additional reading, so there's considerably more than paranoia behind my arguments. Carl ..!ctvax!uokvax!rigney