Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site umcp-cs.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!seismo!rlgvax!cvl!umcp-cs!speaker
From: speaker@umcp-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: Re: Re: Paul's words not only his alone? Partial-Retraction!
Message-ID: <4272@umcp-cs.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 6-Dec-83 19:58:14 EST
Article-I.D.: umcp-cs.4272
Posted: Tue Dec  6 19:58:14 1983
Date-Received: Fri, 9-Dec-83 04:53:13 EST
References: <301@ihuxj.UUCP> <734@garfield.UUCP>
Organization: Univ. of Maryland, Computer Science Dept.
Lines: 16


	Romans, who kept fairly accurate records had none (that we have 
	found) on a Jesus of Nazareth.

I cannot out my finger on the proof, but I recall hearing about
some records found that do describe Jesus physically Why would the
Romans keep such records?  I assume that they kept good records of
judicial precedings.  Is this true?  If such records still exist,
can they be authenticated?

Anyone else heard know of such things?
-- 

					- Bessie the Hellcow
					speaker@umcp-cs
					speaker.umcp-cs@CSnet-Relay