Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site unc.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ulysses!unc!tim
From: tim@unc.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.religion
Subject: Re: "G-d" and destroying holy names - reposting of the rules
Message-ID: <6434@unc.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 17-Dec-83 21:59:02 EST
Article-I.D.: unc.6434
Posted: Sat Dec 17 21:59:02 1983
Date-Received: Sun, 18-Dec-83 23:47:46 EST
References: <2940@utcsrgv.UUCP>
Organization: CS Dept., U. of N. Carolina at Chapel Hill
Lines: 3

Interesting, but with regards to English language translations still being
holy and it being preferable to write "G-d", doesn't that make "G-d" itself
into a translation, and leave you right where you started?