Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!floyd!clyde!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!uiucdcs!parsec!ctvax!uokvax!rigney
From: rigney@uokvax.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.sf-lovers
Subject: Re: >> net.sflovers.whonix << - (nf)
Message-ID: <4509@uiucdcs.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Dec-83 23:45:57 EST
Article-I.D.: uiucdcs.4509
Posted: Wed Dec 14 23:45:57 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Dec-83 02:57:01 EST
Lines: 22

#R:denelcor:-23800:uokvax:5400015:000:815
uokvax!rigney    Dec 13 10:39:00 1983

There is already no standardization with regard to sf newsgroups.
We  have net.movies.sw, net.startrek, and net.sf-lovers, so there
seems no real reason to avoid creating a net.whonix.

On the other hand, there's a lot to be said for  standardization.
Perhaps  if we're going to make a change, we should do everything
at once, and have net.sf, net.sf.sw, net.sf.trek, and net.sf.who.

I rather like the current  chaos,  but  changing  to  a  net.sf.*
designation would allow much easier expansion.  Is it time yet to
move this discussion to net.news.group-lovers?

Perhaps we could also have a net.sf.lovers, altho this  may  give
the  wrong  impression.  I  won't even mention the possibility of
net.sf-lovers.whonix-wizards.

        "So, read any good books lately?"
	        Carl
        ..!ctvax!uokvax!rigney