Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site pur-ee.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!ihnp4!inuxc!pur-ee!isrnix!akp
From: akp@isrnix.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.singles
Subject: Re: discretion - (nf)
Message-ID: <1259@pur-ee.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 15-Dec-83 07:34:46 EST
Article-I.D.: pur-ee.1259
Posted: Thu Dec 15 07:34:46 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Dec-83 02:45:06 EST
Sender: notes@pur-ee.UUCP
Organization: Electrical Engineering Department , Purdue University
Lines: 20

#R:ccieng5:-20300:isrnix:12800005:000:907
isrnix!akp    Dec 12 00:43:00 1983

Something tells me that you didn't read the discussion very closely.
The respondent did not "reject" Laura; it was a point of discussion that
Laura thought any of the "shy male virgins" would have taken her up on an
offer, and one of those people replied, for purposes of discussion, that he
would not.  And "re-deflowering some $100 whore"?  Did you mean to write
"being deflowered BY a $100 whore," or are you confused about who's deflowering
whom?  In any case, I was interested in Laura's original note and the "shy male
virgin"'s response, since it showed that he is a sensitive person who is
not out simply to "alleviate the lust."

	Sorry for the flaming nature of this response, but I am reminded of
my mother who said, of "Risky Business," a movie about an adolescent and about
growing up, "It's about prostitution. It can't be any good."

						-- Allan Pratt
				...decvax!ihnp4!iuvax!isrnix!akp