Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!microsoft!uw-beaver!ubc-visi!mokhtar From: mokhtar@ubc-visi Newsgroups: net.singles Subject: signs? Message-ID: <582@ubc-visi.UUCP> Date: Fri, 23-Dec-83 23:52:22 EST Article-I.D.: ubc-visi.582 Posted: Fri Dec 23 23:52:22 1983 Date-Received: Wed, 28-Dec-83 02:12:25 EST Lines: 26 Someone said that some men seem to understand subtle signs and some don't. I don't think it is that simple. First of all, something which was intended as a sign might be interpreted as an accident followed by no response which will probably leave the woman who gave that sign angry or hurt or both. Even if it is not interpreted as an accident by the man, there is certainly no unique way of interpreting them (either in a positive or negative way). If that where true, men and women would have invented "standard" signs to mean specific things long ago. The world is full of misunderstandings because there can be no such standards. All it takes is for a man to meet a woman who gives him either a "subtle" or "strong" sign and find out later that she didn't "mean" it (just flirting or fooling around) or she changed her mind after she found out more about him (say he didn't have the right characteristics she was looking for). How would you interpret a sign after that? Receiving a sign is not an answer to me. It only brings more questions but maybe I am too cynical. With some people you have to be more persistent. It very much depends on our ways of interpreting things and our past experiences. At some point a necessary risk must be taken by one of the people involved and the outcome may be unpleasant and signs may not make it any easier. How many of us stopped when our initial signs apparently "failed"? I usually make it a rule not to give up unless I get a definite no but there are exceptions. Signed: A man who "obviously" does not understand "subtle" or "strong" signs!