Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 (Tek) 9/26/83; site azure.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!floyd!vax135!cornell!uw-beaver!tektronix!azure!stevesu
From: stevesu@azure.UUCP (Steve Summit)
Newsgroups: net.unix
Subject: Re: functions returning pointers to functions
Message-ID: <2447@azure.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 14-Dec-83 16:51:02 EST
Article-I.D.: azure.2447
Posted: Wed Dec 14 16:51:02 1983
Date-Received: Sat, 17-Dec-83 02:26:08 EST
References: <2430@azure.UUCP>, <416@hammer.UUCP>
Organization: Tektronix, Beaverton OR
Lines: 18

-----------
Crud.  It's been pointed out that I said that

		int (*getroutine))((name,table)

is, amazingly, acceptable to the pdp11 compilers.  That would be
pretty amazing.  What I meant to say was that

		int (*getroutine())(name,table)

is acceptable as well as

		int (*getroutine(name,table))()

which is correct.

Sorry 'bout that.
                                                Steve Summit