Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utcsrgv.UUCP Path: utzoo!utcsrgv!mason From: mason@utcsrgv.UUCP (Dave Mason) Newsgroups: net.women,net.legal Subject: Re: Rape in Ontario Message-ID: <2880@utcsrgv.UUCP> Date: Sat, 3-Dec-83 11:03:01 EST Article-I.D.: utcsrgv.2880 Posted: Sat Dec 3 11:03:01 1983 Date-Received: Sat, 3-Dec-83 13:11:36 EST References: <90@psddevl.UUCP> Organization: University of Toronto/Ryerson Polytechnic Institute Lines: 25 I have very mixed feelings about this issue: a) I agree with Sophie that the woman was probably raped, and putting her in jail for a weeks seems like adding insult to injury. b) If witnesses regularly are allowed to withdraw willingness to testify, criminals will obviously be encouraged to imtimidate victims or other witnesses even more than at present. These are complicated further by: c) The attorney-general says that a variety of offers were made to the woman; including: change of ID, extra police protection, assistance in relocating, assistance in appealing the contempt-of-court charge that put her in jail. She apparently refused all attempts (I wouldn't want to change my ID or relocate, but extra protection would seem ok), and wanted round-the-clock police car outside the front door, ready to escort her, her mother, or her sister anywhere they wanted to go for 20 YEARS! This women was obviously VERY SCARED, or crazy. As an interesting sidelight, a woman in Quebec was allowed to not testify, not because of fear of the rapist, but because she was afraid of the (presumably personal - not violent) repercussions of her boyfriend finding out she had been raped. Although I realize this is not uncommon, I can't believe how any man could feel anything more negative than sympathy when a woman (particularly one close to him) suffers such a personal affront. -- -- Dave Mason, U. Toronto CSRG, {utzoo,linus,cornell,watmath,ihnp4,allegra,floyd,decwrl, decvax,uw-beaver,ubc-vision}!utcsrgv!mason