Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihopa.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!security!genrad!grkermit!masscomp!clyde!burl!hou3c!hocda!houxm!ihnp4!ihopa!dap From: dap@ihopa.UUCP Newsgroups: net.ai Subject: Re: AIList Digest V2 #1 Message-ID: <143@ihopa.UUCP> Date: Tue, 17-Jan-84 15:08:11 EST Article-I.D.: ihopa.143 Posted: Tue Jan 17 15:08:11 1984 Date-Received: Wed, 18-Jan-84 07:29:47 EST References: <15250@sri-arpa.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 11 It seems to me that FORTH would be a very good AI language. It provides the same sort of runtime modifiability and extensibility that Richard talks about, it's EXTREMELY compact and I personally believe that it is easier to read (although neither LISP nor FORTH are paragons of readability). I haven't been reading net.ai much and maybe somebody has brought up this possibility, but after working with FORTH for a while, it seems like an ideal language in a lot of ways. Darrell Plank BTL-IH ihnp4!ihopa!dap