Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site bbncca.ARPA
Path: utzoo!linus!bbncca!sdyer
From: sdyer@bbncca.ARPA (Steve Dyer)
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: More Digital vs. Analogue
Message-ID: <453@bbncca.ARPA>
Date: Sat, 7-Jan-84 18:20:45 EST
Article-I.D.: bbncca.453
Posted: Sat Jan  7 18:20:45 1984
Date-Received: Sun, 8-Jan-84 01:21:41 EST
References: <113@olivej.UUCP>
Organization: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, Cambridge, Ma.
Lines: 13

As has been discussed here before, recording techniques have a profound
effect on the depth and clarity of the soundstage.  I have heard excellent
digital recordings of local Boston performances made by members of the
Boston Audio Society, using only two or three microphones.

Unfortunately, the ossified techniques of many of the major recording
studios and their engineers still produce flat, lifeless and unconvincing
products.  I suspect your bad experiences with digitally recorded records
are actually examples of this.
-- 
/Steve Dyer
decvax!bbncca!sdyer
sdyer@bbncca