Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 6/24/83; site rabbit.UUCP
Path: utzoo!linus!decvax!harpo!eagle!allegra!alice!rabbit!jj
From: jj@rabbit.UUCP
Newsgroups: net.audio
Subject: Re: Re (..!rabbit!jj): High Quality Recordings
Message-ID: <2368@rabbit.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 9-Jan-84 11:41:56 EST
Article-I.D.: rabbit.2368
Posted: Mon Jan  9 11:41:56 1984
Date-Received: Tue, 10-Jan-84 00:51:26 EST
References: <355@whuxk.UUCP>, <2349@rabbit.UUCP>, <766@drufl.UUCP>
Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill
Lines: 23


WEll, Phil, since we're moving out of the realm of physical
<and here I include perceptual)  fact and into the realm
of unjustified opinion,  (in other words, we're starting to
talk like Doug Sax) let's move to net.flame.

Your comments just don't take account of the research that
has gone into digital methods of recording.  <The analog disc
was perfected ON the market, the digital disc was essentially
designed completely before hitting the market.  Furthermore,
the techniques used on the digital disc are neither new nor
untested, they are merely new to the CONSUMER market. 

The digital signal processing community have been using the
same techniques as CD's for (in some cases) up to 20 years.


See you in net.flame

-- 
-Diogenes stopped here-

(allegra,harpo,ulysses)!rabbit!jj