Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10.1 exptools 1/6/84; site ihu1g.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!ihnp4!ihu1g!fish From: fish@ihu1g.UUCP (Bob Fishell) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: NX 40 ... Message-ID: <140@ihu1g.UUCP> Date: Fri, 13-Jan-84 16:46:45 EST Article-I.D.: ihu1g.140 Posted: Fri Jan 13 16:46:45 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 14-Jan-84 23:57:19 EST References: <65@whuxj.UUCP>, <2204@allegra.UUCP> Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Naperville, IL Lines: 40 I can't speak for the NX-40, but I shall once again write in praise of the dbx model 224 nr system. I have been using it for about 3 1/2 years now, on a wide selection of music including solo piano works. I have discovered no pump-wheeze noise problems, no residual hiss (what there is is below the noise floor of my amplifier), in short, no audible trouble AT ALL, on any type of recorded material. Of course, I use it with an open reel deck, not with cassettes. Maybe that's part of the difference; open-reel tape is much quieter than cassettes when no noise reduction is used. I must reiterate: dbx provides calibration instructions with their units which must be followed carefully. I think some of the problems folks are having out there are related to improper calibration. dbx works by applying 2:1 (dB) compression to the input signal, along with preemphasis of the high frequencies. One thing this does is tax the high frequency response characteristics of the recorder and the tape used. Again, open reel decks are far better than cassettes in this category. The best specs I have ever seen on a cassette deck ran into something like 19kHz on the high end. Open reel decks recording at 7 1/2 ips typically go up to 24kHz. This response difference could also be a source of problems for dbx users with cassette decks. Unless one of the better decks is used, with metal tape, some of the information in the original input signal could get squeezed out by the compression and preemphasis. The result on playback would be distortion and a loss of high frequency harmonics. This would be especially noticable on piano music, where harmonic content and purity are the key to good reproduction. I have found Dolby C and metal tape (I have the Harmon-Kardon CD201 deck) to be perfectly adequate for many types of recording, but I can notice a difference in the clarity and definition of the sound. I always know I'm listening to a tape with the cassette deck, but the dbx-encoded reels sound considerably more like the originals they're made from. Cassettes are compact and convenient, but I don't believe that they will ever match the quality one can get with open reels. Furthermore, I think that dbx is probably best suited for open reel applications; cassette deck owners should be content with Dolby. It's not perfect, but it's pretty good, and it's economical. Bob Fishell