Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Posting-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site hound.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!philabs!seismo!harpo!eagle!mhuxl!houxm!hound!rfg From: rfg@hound.UUCP (R.GRANTGES) Newsgroups: net.audio Subject: Re: AM Stereo Methods (&Retractios) Message-ID: <389@hound.UUCP> Date: Thu, 26-Jan-84 13:01:13 EST Article-I.D.: hound.389 Posted: Thu Jan 26 13:01:13 1984 Date-Received: Sat, 28-Jan-84 01:18:48 EST References: <165@ihu1g.UUCP> Organization: Bell Labs, Holmdel NJ Lines: 23 I believe your information about the FCC is a little out of date. Actually they ultimately decided to let "the marketplace" decide, presumably in keeping with a recent president's ideas about hairy-chested free enterprise. In any event, four or five systems have been given the nod to compete. One recently gave up voluntarily. From time to time I see promises that someone is going to bring out a receiver for brand x. E.G., Delco, I think announced it would use the Motorola (?) system. Meanwhile there are some sets on the market that will decode all or most of the four versions. Sony recently announced a portable that received any of the four with but one switch for the listener to throw.Someone is marketing a transmitter that will transmit any of the competing systems with the right applique circuitry. In stereo TV, the last I saw an industry committee was rushing to make a recommendation to the FCC before the end of 1983. The hope was that the FCC might accept the recommendation of the committee rather than repeat the AM stereo fiasco. The report had to be ready by the end of the year because for some reason or other such a committee would become illegal after that (antitrust foolishness). Thus, it is possible, but unlikely, that by the end of "Big Brother year" we could have both AM and TV Stereo. By the way, if you are near an AM transmitter there is no reason it shouldn't sound pretty good. Maybe not as good as FM stereo, but definitely a plus for those who were listening anyway. -Dick Grantges hound!rfg